Project Bibliography
























Adamo, G. (1987). La codifica come rappresentazione. Trasmissione e trattamento dell’informazione nell’elaborazione automatica di dati in ambito umanistico. In G. Gigliozzi (Ed.), Studi di codifica e trattamento automatico di testi (pp. 39–63). Roma.
Batterman, R. W. (2009). Idealization and modeling. Synthese, 169(3), 427–446.
Beynon, M., Russ, S., & McCarty, W. (2006). Human Computing—Modelling with Meaning. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 21(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fql015
Bohusch, O. (1972). Lexikon der grammatischen Terminologie. Donauwörth: Verlag Ludwig Auer.
Bußmann, H. (2008). Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.
Buzzetti, D. (2006). Biblioteche digitali e oggetti digitali complessi: Esaustività e funzionalità nella conservazione. In Archivi informatici per il patrimonio culturale (Vol. 114, pp. 41–75). Roma: Bardi Editore. Retrieved from http://web.dfc.unibo.it/buzzetti/dbuzzetti/pubblicazioni/lincei2003.pdf
Buzzetti, D. (2015). Turing and Automated Text Processing. In G. J. Croll & N. G. Gregory (Eds.), Explorations, Proceedings ANPA 35, July 2015, Ryde (pp. 1–34). Absoprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1926.0649
Buzzetti, D. (2002). Digital Representation and the Text Model. New Literary History, 33(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh. 2002.0003
Buzzetti, D., & Rehbein, M. (2008). Towards a model for dynamic text editions. In L. L. Opas-Hänninen, M. Jokelainen, I. Juuso, & T. Seppänen (Eds.), Digital Humanities 2008 (pp. 78–81). Oulu: University of Oulu. Retrieved from http://www.ekl.oulu.fi/dh2008/Digital%20Humanities%202008%20Book%20of%20Abstracts.pdf
Campagnolo, A. (2015). Transforming structured descriptions to visual representations : an automated visualization of historical bookbinding structures (Ph.D.). University of the Arts London. Retrieved from http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/8749/
Carstensen, K.-U. (2010). Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie. Heidelberg.
Ciula, A. (2004). Digital palaeography. In Digital Resources for the Humanities. Newcastle.
Ciula, A. (2004). Modelli di scrittura carolina. Gazette Du Livre Médiéval, 45, 27–38.
Ciula, A. (2009). The Palaeographical Method under the Light of a Digital Approach. In M. Rehbein, T. Schaßan, & P. Sahle (Eds.), Kodikologie und Paläographie im digitalen Zeitalter – Codicology and Palaeography in the Digital Age (pp. 219–235). Norderstedt: Books on Demand (BoD). Retrieved from http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2971/
Ciula, A. (2005). Digital palaeography: using the digital representation of medieval script to support palaeographic analysis. Digital Medievalist, 1(Spring). Retrieved from http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/journal/1.1/ciula/
Ciula, A., & Eide, Ø. (2016). Modelling in digital humanities: Signs in context. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw045
Ciula, A., & Eide, Ø. (2014). Reflections on Cultural Heritage and Digital Humanities: Modelling in Practice and Theory. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage (pp. 35–41). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2595188.2595207
Ciula, A., & Marras, C. (2016). Circling around texts and language: towards “pragmatic modelling” in Digital Humanities. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000258/000258.html
Ciula, A., Spence, P., & Vieira, J. M. (2008). Expressing complex associations in medieval historical documents: the Henry III Fine Rolls Project. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn018
Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., & Stiff, M. (Eds.). (2011, November). Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. CIDOC, {Heraklion}, 2011. Version 5.0.4. Produced by the ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group, Continued by the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. Retrieved from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.4.pdf
Dunn, S., & Schumacher, M. (2016). Explaining Events to Computers: Critical Quantification, Multiplicity and Narratives in Cultural Heritage. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000262/000262.html
Eide, Ø. (2013). Why Maps Are Silent When Texts Can Speak. Detecting Media Differences through Conceptual Modelling. In International Cartographic Conference (Ed.), Proceedings of the 26th International Cartographic Conference Dresden, 25-30 August 2013. Dresden: ICC. Retrieved from http://www.icc2013.org/_contxt/_medien/_upload/_proceeding/31_proceeding.pdf
Eide, Ø. (2015). Ontologies, data modelling, and TEI. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, (8), forthcoming.
Elleström, L. (Forthcoming). Bridging the gap between image and metaphor through cross-modal iconicity: An interdisciplinary model. In O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (Eds.). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Finegan, E. (2008). Language: its structure and use (5th ed.). Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.
Fischer, H.-D., & Uerpmann, H. (1996). Einführung in die deutsche Sprachwissenschaft. Ehrenwirth.
Fischer, F., Fritze, C., & Vogeler, G. (Eds.). (2011). Kodikologie und Paläographie im digitalen Zeitalter 2 – Codicology and Palaeography in the Digital Age 2. Norderstedt: Books on Demand (BoD). Retrieved from http://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/4337/
Fix, M. (2006). Texte schreiben (2nd ed.). Paderborn: UTB.
Flanders, J. (2009). The Productive Unease of 21st-century Digital Scholarship. Digital Humanities Quarterly, (3). Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000055/000055.html
Flanders, J., & Jannidis, F. (2015). Knowledge Organization and Data Modeling in the Humanities (White paper). Retrieved from http://www.wwp.northeastern.edu/outreach/conference/kodm2012/ flanders_jannidis_datamodeling.pdf
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2012). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall). Stanford University. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/models-science/
Gansel, C., & Jürgens, F. (n.d.). Textlinguistik und Textgrammatik (2nd ed.). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. In A. Ortony & B. Gholson (Eds.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed, pp. 447–480). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Models and fictions in science. Philosophical Studies, 143(1), 101–116.
Grimm, H., & Engelkamp, J. (1981). Sprachpsychologie : Handbuch und Lexikon der Psycholinguistik (Vol. 1). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
Hassner, T., Rehbein, M., Stokes, P. A., & Wolf, L. (2012). Computation and Palaeography: Potentials and Limits (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12382 No. 2.9) (pp. 184–199). Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. Retrieved from http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2013/3890/pdf/dagrep_v002_i009_p184_s12382.pdf
Hassner, T., Rehbein, M., Stokes, P. A., & Wolf, L. (2013). Computation and Palaeography: Potentials and Limits (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 12382 No. 2.1) (pp. 14–35). Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. Retrieved from http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2013/4167/
Herrmann, J. B. (2013). Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/handle/1871/43562
Hoffman, R. R. (1985). Some Implication of Metaphor for Philosophy and Psychology of Science. In W. Paprotté & R. Dirven (Eds.), The Ubiquity of metaphor metaphor in language and thought (pp. 327–380). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
Holtus, G., Metzeltin, M., & Schmitt, C. (2001). Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Jannidis, F., & Flanders, J. (2013). A concept of data modeling for the humanities. Presented at the Digital Humanities, Paper presented at Digital Humanities conference, Lincoln, NE, July. Retrieved from http://dh2013.unl.edu/abstracts/ab-313.html
Kralemann, B., & Lattmann, C. (2013). Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs. Synthese, 190(16), 3397–3420.
Le Boeuf, P., Doerr, M., Ore, C. E., & Stead, S. (2015, May). Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Version 6.2. Retrieved from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_6.2.pdf
Linke, A., Markus Nussbaumer, & Paul R. Portmann. (2001). Studienbuch Linguistik (4th ed.). Niemeyer.
Lipka, L. (1990). An Outline of English Lexicology (Vol. 3). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Lorenz, O. (1992). Kleines Lexikon literarischer Grundbegriffe. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Mahr, B. (2009). Information science and the logic of models. Software & Systems Modeling, 8(3), 365–383.
Marras, C. (2013). Structuring multidisciplinary knowledge: Aquatic and terrestrial metaphors. Arqueol. Mex. Arqueologia Mexicana, 40(6), 392–399. Retrieved from http://www.isko.org/ko.html
McCarty, W. (2005). Tree, Turf, Centre, Archipelago–or Wild Acre? Metaphors and Stories for Humanities Computing. Literary and Linguistic Computing Literary and Linguistic Computing, 21(1), 1–13.